Once upon a time Paris Hilton was hired to wear and represent a line of hair extensions. (Now she has her own.)
Apparently Paris was less than loyal to her hair benefactor and strayed to more lavish fake hair products. AND NOW SHE SHALL PAY FOR HER INFIDELITY!!!

Paris was the (allegedly) the spokesperson for Hairtech International’s Dream Catcher hair extension line in 2007. The company is claiming that she was “seen in magazines and on television not wearing [their] hair extensions and was in fact wearing competitors hair extension products.” The company also claims that when Paris was incarcerated in June of 2007 and that she was serving time when she should have been at an important launch party for the extensions.

Hairtech International is accusing Paris of fraud and deceit. They are also claiming a loss of $35 million due to her breach of contract.

Wait. WHAT? 35 MILLION???? They lost 35 million in fake hair sales? Really? WTF dude…I am so in the wrong line of work. I love some fake hair but is it really THAT (and by that I mean that they lost 35 million over Paris) lucrative because I have never even heard of these people or their hair. Are they the people that make Barbie hair…I can see that bringing in the bucks. DAMN YOU COLLEGE DEGREE…I could have made millions selling FAKE HAIR!


Tags: , , , , , , ,

One Response to “Paris: heiress or hairess?”

  1. [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Ronda , Southern Fried Snark. Southern Fried Snark said: Paris: heiress or hairess? http://bit.ly/ccYaU7 [...]

Leave a Reply